McFarland v. State of California
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/5/2016 DISMISSING this action, without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOUGLAS SCOTT McFARLAND,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2568-EFB P
v.
ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
17
18
28 U.S.C. § 2254. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28
19
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to petitioner’s consent. See 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).
21
On October 31, 2016, the court found that petitioner had failed to pay the $5 filing fee
22
required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submit the
23
affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the court
24
ordered petitioner to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) within
25
thirty days and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed.
The time for acting has passed and petitioner has not paid the filing fee, submitted an
26
27
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
28
/////
1
1
2
Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice.
Dated: December 5, 2016.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?