McFarland v. State of California

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/5/2016 DISMISSING this action, without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOUGLAS SCOTT McFARLAND, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2568-EFB P v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 17 18 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to petitioner’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). 21 On October 31, 2016, the court found that petitioner had failed to pay the $5 filing fee 22 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submit the 23 affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the court 24 ordered petitioner to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) within 25 thirty days and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. The time for acting has passed and petitioner has not paid the filing fee, submitted an 26 27 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 28 ///// 1 1 2 Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: December 5, 2016. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?