Cuviello v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/12/20 ORDERING that this matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-02584-KJM-KJN

v.

ORDER

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

On December 10, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

18

remanded this matter to this court for further proceedings. (ECF No. 54.) Due to the plaintiff’s

19

pro se status, the undersigned continued to preside over this action pursuant to Local Rule

20

302(c)(21). However, on February 28, 2020, plaintiff’s counsel entered an appearance in this

21

case. (ECF No. 64.) Because no party is proceeding pro se in this action, Local Rule 302(c)(21)

22

no longer applies and the case is referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore, all

23

pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the

24

District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all

25

duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is referred back to the District

2

Judge assigned to this action pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: March 12, 2020

5
6
16cv2584.refer

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2