Martinez v. Rio Consumnes Correctional Center et al
Filing
5
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/19/16 ordering that within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for his failure to comply with the court's 11/10/16 order. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDGAR MARTINEZ, Sr.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:16-cv-2590 DB P
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RIO CONSUMNES CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
18
19
§1983. In an order filed November 10, 2016, plaintiff was advised that his application to proceed
20
in forma pauperis was incomplete. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was ordered to submit, within thirty
21
days, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified
22
copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the
23
filing of the complaint. Plaintiff was advised that his failure to comply with the November 11
24
order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
Thirty days has passed and plaintiff has failed to file the completed affidavit and the trust
25
26
account statement or otherwise respond to the court’s November 10 order.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days of the date of this order,
2
plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for his failure
3
to comply with the court’s November 10, 2016 order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R.
4
110.
5
Dated: December 19, 2016
6
7
8
9
10
11
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/mart2590.fifp
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?