Lucien v. Macomber et al.

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/12/2018 ADOPTING 20 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against defendants Macomber, Baughman, Turner, and Boe. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JARON LUCIEN, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2595 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF MACOMBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 29, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On December 28, 2017, 23 plaintiff was granted an additional 30 day extension to file an amended complaint, but filed no 24 amended complaint within that time. Plaintiff has also not filed objections to the findings and 25 recommendations. 26 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 27 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 28 ORDERED that: 1 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2017 (ECF No. 20) are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Macomber, Baughman, Turner, and Boe are 4 dismissed with prejudice. 5 Dated: February 12, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DLB:9 Luci2595.800 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?