Lucien v. Macomber et al.
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/18/18 GRANTING plaintiff 10 days after being served with this order to file an opposition re 32 Motion to Compel. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JARON LUCIEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2595 WBS DB P
v.
ORDER
WOODEN,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action under
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 12, 2018, defendant filed a motion to compel plaintiff to
19
respond to interrogatories and requests for production of documents. (ECF No. 32.) As
20
described in the court’s March 1, 2018 order, all motions shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule
21
230(l). (ECF No. 26.) Local Rule 230(l) requires a party to file an opposition to a motion within
22
21 days after the date of service of the motion. If a party fails to oppose a motion, the court may
23
consider that failure a waiver of any opposition to the motion.
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to defendant’s motion to compel. If he does not file
2
an opposition within ten days of the date of service of this order, the court will assume plaintiff
3
does not oppose the motion and will grant defendant’s motion to compel.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 18, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-civil rights/luci2595.mtc req oppo
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?