Fickardt v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/31/17 ORDERING that the due date for defendant to respond to the 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 09/05/17. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8956
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
CASEY FICKARDT,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02596-CMK
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME OF 8 DAYS FOR
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective
20
21
counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of an additional 8 days to
22
respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. This is the third continuance sought by
23
Defendant. The current due date is August 28, 2017. The new due date will be September 5,
24
2017.
25
There is good cause for this request. Since Defendant’s last request on July 25, 2017,
26
Defendant’s counsel had been diligently addressing her full workload including several district
27
court cases and one Equal Employment Opportunity Commission matter involving discovery and
28
another Equal Employment Opportunity Commission case involving briefing. Moreover,
1
1
between July 25, 2017 and August 28, 2017, Defendant’s counsel had additional unanticipated
2
matters that involved extensive briefing, including two district court decisions decided on July
3
31, 2017, and August 4, 2017, to which counsel needed to file objections or motions in response,
4
with deadlines that could not be extended. Despite counsel’s diligence in responding to the new
5
matters and her remaining workload, counsel was set back in addressing all her other cases,
6
including this one. Therefore, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and
7
including September 5, 2017, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by
8
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in this case. This request is made in good faith with no
9
intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
10
11
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified
accordingly.
12
13
Respectfully submitted,
Date: August 28, 2017
14
15
s/ James S. Pi by C.Chen*
(As authorized by e-mail on 8/28/2017)
JAMES S. PI
Attorneys for Plaintiff
16
17
18
CHARLES E. BINDER AND HARRY J. BINDER,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Date: August 28, 2017
19
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
By s/ Carolyn B. Chen
CAROLYN B. CHEN
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney
20
21
22
Attorneys for Defendant
23
24
25
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
26
27
Dated: August 31, 2017
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?