Maestas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/21/17 nunc pro tunc ORDERING that Defendant's response to the Third Amended Complaint shall be filed by 08/04/17. (Benson, A.)

1 LTL ATTORNEYS LLP
Eugene Hahm (SBN 167596)
2 [e-mail]
James M. Lee (SBN 192301)
3 [e-mail]
300 S. Grand Ave, 14th Floor
4 Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel.: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendant
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

CASE NO.: 2:16−CV−02597−KJM−KJN
LARRY MAESTAS,

13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

Complaint served: November 17, 2016

16
17 WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendant.

Current response date: July 21, 2017
Third Amended Complaint submission
date: June 23, 2017

1

Plaintiff Larry Maestas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

2 (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows:
3

1.

On June 23, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Third Amended Complaint.

4

2.

Defendant’s response to the Third Amended Complaint is currently due

5 on July 21, 2017.
6

3.

Because of conflicts with Defendant’s counsel’s personal schedule, and

7 in order to allow the parties to further meet and confer regarding a possible pleadings
8 motion in response to Plaintiff’s complaint, the parties hereby stipulate to an
9 additional two-week extension for Defendant to file its response to the Third
10 Amended Complaint.
11

NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel of record, the

12 parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant’s response to the Third Amended
13 Complaint shall be filed and served no later than August 4, 2017.
14
15
16 DATED: July 21, 2017

LTL ATTORNEYS LLP

17
18
19

By

20
21

Eugene Hahm
James M. Lee
Attorneys for Defendant
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

22
23 DATED: July 21, 2017

LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.

24
25
26
27
28

By

Todd M. Friedman
Attorney for Plaintiff
Larry Maestas
2

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3 DATED: July 21, 2017
4 (nunc pro tunc)
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3