Maestas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/5/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint by 1/13/2017; ORDERING the defendant to respond to said amended complaint within thirty (30) days of its filing. (Michel, G.)

1 LTL ATTORNEYS LLP
Eugene Hahm (SBN 167596)
2 [e-mail]
James M. Lee (SBN 192301)
3 [e-mail]
300 S. Grand Avenue, 14th Floor
4 Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel.: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendant
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

CASE NO.: 2:16−CV−02597−KJM−KJN
LARRY MAESTAS,

13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

16
17 WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Complaint served: November 17, 2016
Current response date: January 5, 2017

18
19

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING
DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendant.

First Amended Complaint submission
date: January 13, 2017

1

Plaintiff Larry Maestas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

2 (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows:
3

1.

On November 17, 2016, Plaintiff served its summons and complaint on

4 Defendant.
5

2.

On December 5, 2016, pursuant to Local Rule 144, the parties filed a

6 stipulation extending Defendant’s deadline respond to Plaintiff’s complaint until
7 January 5, 2017 (Dkt. No. 5).
8

3.

On December 15, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s standing order (Dkt.

9 No. 3-1, p. 3), the parties met and conferred regarding Defendant’s intention to file a
10 pleadings motion as its response to Plaintiff’s complaint.
11

4.

In the interest of judicial economy, and to avoid any unnecessary

12 motion practice, the parties agreed that Plaintiff would submit an amended
13 complaint to address Defendant’s contentions by no later than January 13, 2017, and
14 that Defendant’s response would be due thirty (30) days after the filing of the
15 amended complaint.
16

5.

This is the parties’ second request to extend Defendant’s time to

17 respond to Plaintiff’s complaint.
18

NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel of record, the

19 parties hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint in
20 Case No. 2:16−CV−02597−KJM−KJN by no later than January 13, 2017, and
21 Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s first amended complaint shall be due no later
22 than thirty (30) days after the filing of the amended complaint.
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
2

1 DATED: January 4, 2017

LTL ATTORNEYS LLP

2
3
4

By /s/ James M. Lee
Eugene Hahm
James M. Lee
Attorneys for Defendant
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

5
6
7
8 DATED: January 4, 2017

LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.

9
10
11

By /s/ Todd M. Friedman (as authorized on 01/04/2017)
Todd M. Friedman
Attorney for Plaintiff
Larry Maestas

12
13
14
15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: January 5, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3