Brooks et al v. FCI Lender Services, Inc. et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/27/2016 ORDERING that Defendant shall have until 1/23/2017, to file and serve its response to Plaintiffs' Complaint in this action. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
JOHN BROOKS, LAURA BROOKS,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02598-KJM-KJN
Hon. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman
v.
FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC., a Corporation;
MDJ PROPERTIES, LLC, a Limited Liability
Company; BUCKS FINANCIAL, LLC, a Limited
Liability Company; SN SERVICING
CORPORATION, a Corporation; MADISON
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Limited
Liability Company; CALIFORNIA TD
SPECIALISTS; HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL,
LLC, a Limited Liability Company; OCWEN
LOAN SERVICING
AND DOES 1 TO 50,
19
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
INITIAL COMPLAINT
Current Response Date: December 22, 2016
New Response Date: January 23, 2017
Action Filed: October 6, 2016
Trial Date: N/A
Defendants.
20
21
The Court having considered the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint
22
(the “Stipulation”) entered into by and between plaintiffs John Brooks and Laura Brooks
23
(“Plaintiffs”) and defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Defendant”), and good cause appearing
24
therefor,
25
/././
26
/././
27
/././
28
/././
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-02598-KJM-KJN
1
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
811131.1
1
IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is APPROVED.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall have until January 23, 2017, to file and
3
serve its response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint in this action.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: December 27, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-02598-KJM-KJN
2
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
811131.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?