Brooks et al v. FCI Lender Services, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/18/2017 GRANTING 24 Request for Telephonic Appearance. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 5 McGLINCHEY STAFFORD Brian A. Paino (SBN 251243) Dhruv M. Sharma (SBN 279545) 18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 350 Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 381-5900 Facsimile: (949) 271-4040 Email: 6 Attorneys for Defendant OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 JOHN BROOKS, LAURA BROOKS, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC., a Corporation; MDJ PROPERTIES, LLC, a Limited Liability Company; BUCKS FINANCIAL, LLC, a Limited Liability Company; SN SERVICING CORPORATION, a Corporation; MADISON MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Limited Liability Company; CALIFORNIA TD SPECIALISTS; HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC, a Limited Liability Company; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING AND DOES 1 TO 50, 19 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02598-KJM-KJN Hon. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC’S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT DEFENDANT FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT Hearing: Date: January 19, 2017 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 25, 8th Floor Defendants. 20 Having reviewed defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s (“Defendant”) Request to Appear 21 by Telephone (the “Request”) at the hearing on defendant FCI Lender Services, Inc.’s Motion to 22 Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint and Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ Complaint (the “Motion”), 23 and good cause appearing therefor, 24 IT IS ORDERED that the Request is GRANTED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: January 18, 2017 27 28 1 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-02598-KJM-KJN ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE 29 30 819387.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?