Brooks et al v. FCI Lender Services, Inc. et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/18/2017 GRANTING 24 Request for Telephonic Appearance. (Michel, G.)
1
5
McGLINCHEY STAFFORD
Brian A. Paino (SBN 251243)
Dhruv M. Sharma (SBN 279545)
18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 350
Irvine, California 92612
Telephone:
(949) 381-5900
Facsimile:
(949) 271-4040
Email:
bpaino@mcglinchey.com
dsharma@mcglinchey.com
6
Attorneys for Defendant OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
JOHN BROOKS, LAURA BROOKS,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
v.
FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC., a Corporation;
MDJ PROPERTIES, LLC, a Limited Liability
Company; BUCKS FINANCIAL, LLC, a Limited
Liability Company; SN SERVICING
CORPORATION, a Corporation; MADISON
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Limited
Liability Company; CALIFORNIA TD
SPECIALISTS; HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL,
LLC, a Limited Liability Company; OCWEN
LOAN SERVICING
AND DOES 1 TO 50,
19
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02598-KJM-KJN
Hon. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC’S
REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE
AT DEFENDANT FCI LENDER
SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT AND
MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
Hearing:
Date: January 19, 2017
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Ctrm: 25, 8th Floor
Defendants.
20
Having reviewed defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s (“Defendant”) Request to Appear
21
by Telephone (the “Request”) at the hearing on defendant FCI Lender Services, Inc.’s Motion to
22
Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint and Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ Complaint (the “Motion”),
23
and good cause appearing therefor,
24
IT IS ORDERED that the Request is GRANTED.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: January 18, 2017
27
28
1
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-02598-KJM-KJN
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE
29
30
819387.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?