Ravel v. Hewlett-Packard Enterprises, Inc.
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/11/2017 ORDERING that the Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to 6/19/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Zignago, K.)
1
Counsel Appear On Following Page
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BETTY L. RAVEL, an individual,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and Does 1100, Inclusive,
Defendants.
17
Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Ctrm.:
Judge:
May 22, 2017
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5
Hon. William B. Shubb
Complaint filed: September 21, 2016
Trial date: Not Set
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
David Graulich, Esq. (State Bar No. 260515)
LAW PRACTICE OF DAVID GRAULICH
PO box 2041
Fair Oaks, CA 95628
Telephone (916) 966-9600
Email: david@wrongedatwork.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
BETTY L. RAVEL
BENJAMIN A. EMMERT, Bar No. 212157
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
Telephone:
408.998.4150
Fax No.:
408.288.5686
BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
916.830.7200
Fax No.:
916.561.0828
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1.
Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB
1
Plaintiff BETTY L. RAVEL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD
2
ENTERPRISE, INC. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective
3
counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
4
5
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2017, by stipulation of the Parties, the Court referred this
matter to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program pursuant to Local Rule 271;
6
7
WHEREAS, on April 27, 2017, the Parties participated in a mediation conducted by
Terry A. Wills of the law firm Cook/Brown;
8
9
WHEREAS, the Parties did not reach a resolution of the lawsuit at the mediation, but
have continued to engage in settlement discussions following the mediation;
10
WHEREAS, the Parties request the Court continue the Case Management Conference
11
currently set for May 22, 2017, to June 19, 2017, to allow additional time to attempt to settle this
12
lawsuit.
13
14
15
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, that the Case Management
Conference be continued to from May 22, 2017, to June 19, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
17
Dated: May 10, 2017
18
/s/ David Graulich
DAVID GRAULICH, Esq.
LAW PRACTICE OF DAVID GRAULICH
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Betty L. Ravel
19
20
21
22
Dated: May 10, 2017
23
/s/ Benjamin A. Emmert
BENJAMIN A. EMMERT
BARBARA A. BLACKBURN
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
2.
Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB
1
ORDER
2
Based on the stipulation between the parties and for good cause shown, the Case
3
Management Conference currently scheduled in the above-captioned matter for May 22, 2017, is
4
hereby continued to June 19, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 11, 2017
8
Firmwide:147536477.1 086660.1003
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3.
Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?