Ravel v. Hewlett-Packard Enterprises, Inc.
Filing
20
STATUS PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/13/2017 ORDERING After reviewing the parties' Joint Status Report, the court hereby VACATES the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for 6/19/2017; Initia l Disclosures required by FRCP 26(a)(1) by 7/14/2017; Discloser of Expert Witnesses due by 12/8/2017, expert testimony for rebuttal by 1/12/2018; Discovery due by 2/9/2018; Dispositive Motions filed by 4/13/2018; Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/18/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; and Jury Trial set for 8/14/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
BETTY RAVEL,
13
CIV. NO. 2:16-2610 WBS DB
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE,
INC. and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
16
17
Defendant.
18
----oo0oo----
19
20
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
21
22
After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the
23
court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference
24
scheduled for June 19, 2017, and makes the following findings and
25
orders without needing to consult with the parties any further.
26
I.
27
Plaintiff brought this action in the California
28
CASE BACKGROUND
Superior Court on September 21, 2016.
1
(Notice of Removal Ex. A,
1
Compl. (Docket No. 1).)
2
court on November 1, 2016.
3
Defendant removed this action to this
(Notice of Removal (Docket No. 1).)
After removal, defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff’s
4
complaint.
(Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss (Docket No. 4).)
On January
5
11, 2017, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss in part
6
and dismissed plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
7
claims and age discrimination claim.1
8
(Docket No. 10).)
9
plaintiff twenty days from the date of the order to file an
(Jan. 11, 2017 Order at 23
In its dismissal order, the court provided
10
amended complaint.
11
Complaint on January 31, (Am. Compl. (Docket No. 11)), and
12
defendant filed an Answer to that Complaint on February 14,
13
(Answer (Docket No. 12)).
14
(Id. at 24.)
Plaintiff filed an amended
On March 2, the parties notified the court that they
15
had agreed to participate in the court’s Voluntary Dispute
16
Resolution Program (“VDRP”).
17
(Docket No. 13.)
On May 12, the parties notified the court that they
18
completed VDRP and were not able to settle this action.
19
filed the present Joint Status Report on June 9.
20
They
Report (Docket No. 19).)
(Joint Status
21
II.
SERVICE OF PROCESS
22
The named defendant has been served, and no further
23
service is permitted except with leave of court, good cause
24
having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).
25
///
26
27
28
1
The court declined to dismiss plaintiff’s Fair
Employment and Housing Act disability discrimination claims and
intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. (Jan. 11,
2017 Order at 23-24 (Docket No. 10).)
2
1
III. JOINDER OF PARTIES
2
No further joinder of parties or amendment to pleadings
3
is permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been
4
shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).
5
v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
See Johnson
6
IV. JURISDICTION/VENUE
7
Jurisdiction is predicated upon federal question
8
jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et
9
seq.
Venue is undisputed and hereby found to be proper.
10
V.
DISCOVERY
11
The parties shall serve the initial disclosures
12
required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) by July 14,
13
2017.
14
The parties shall disclose experts and produce reports
15
in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by
16
December 8, 2017.
17
solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and reports
18
produced in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2) by January 12, 2018.
19
With regard to expert testimony intended
All other discovery, including depositions for
20
preservation of testimony, is left open, save and except that it
21
shall be so conducted as to be completed by February 9, 2018.
22
The word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been
23
conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any
24
disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by
25
appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been
26
ordered, the order has been obeyed.
27
discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in
28
accordance with the local rules of this court and so that such
3
All motions to compel
1
motions may be heard (and any resulting orders obeyed) not later
2
than February 9, 2018.
3
VI.
4
All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
5
restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be
6
filed on or before April 13, 2018.
7
for the next available hearing date.
8
refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing
9
and opposing such motions on the court’s regularly scheduled law
10
All motions shall be noticed
Counsel are cautioned to
and motion calendar.
11
VII.
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
12
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for June 18, 2018,
13
at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5.
14
attended by at least one of the attorneys who will conduct the
15
trial for each of the parties and by any unrepresented parties.
16
The conference shall be
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for
17
trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no matters
18
remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for
19
oral testimony.
20
and are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the
21
contents of and time for filing those statements.
22
those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to
23
provide the court with: (1) a plain, concise statement which
24
identifies every non-discovery motion which has been made to the
25
court, and its resolution; (2) a list of the remaining claims as
26
against each defendant; and (3) the estimated number of trial
27
days.
28
Counsel shall file separate pretrial statements,
In addition to
In providing the plain, concise statements of
4
1
undisputed facts and disputed factual issues contemplated by
2
Local Rule 281(b)(3)-(4), the parties shall emphasize the claims
3
that remain at issue, and any remaining affirmatively pled
4
defenses thereto.
5
parties shall also prepare a succinct statement of the case,
6
which is appropriate for the court to read to the jury.
If the case is to be tried to a jury, the
7
VIII.
8
A jury trial is set August 14, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
9
TRIAL SETTING
The
parties estimate that trial will last five days.
10
IX.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
11
A Settlement Conference will be set at the time of the
12
Pretrial Conference.
13
the court whether they will stipulate to the trial judge acting
14
as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof.
15
All parties should be prepared to advise
Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full
16
settlement authority present at the Settlement Conference or to
17
be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms.
18
seven calendar days before the Settlement Conference counsel for
19
each party shall submit a confidential Settlement Conference
20
Statement for review by the settlement judge.
21
judge is not the trial judge, the Settlement Conference
22
Statements shall not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed
23
to the trial judge.
At least
If the settlement
24
X.
MODIFICATIONS TO SCHEDULING ORDER
25
Any requests to modify the dates or terms of this
26
Scheduling Order, except requests to change the date of the
27
trial, may be heard and decided by the assigned Magistrate Judge.
28
All requests to change the trial date shall be heard and decided
5
1
only by the undersigned judge.
2
Dated:
June 13, 2017
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?