Ravel v. Hewlett-Packard Enterprises, Inc.

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER to dismiss this action with prejudice 28 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/8/2018. Each Party shall bear her/its own litigation costs, expenses and attorney fees. CASE CLOSED. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5

BENJAMIN A. EMMERT, Bar No. 212157
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 7th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
Telephone: [phone]
Fax No.:
408.288.5686
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY

6
7

8
9

DAVID GRAULICH, Bar No. 260515
LAW PRACTICE OF DAVID GRAULICH
PO Box 2041
Fair Oaks, Ca 95628
Telephone [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

10
11

Attorney For Plaintiff
BETTY RAVEL

12

(Additional Counsel Listed On Following Page)

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

BETTY L. RAVEL, an individual,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.

Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB
STIPULATION FOR ORDER DISMISSING
LAWSUIT WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED
ORDER

HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and Does
1-100, Inclusive,
Defendants.

Complaint filed: September 21, 2016
Trial date: August 14, 2018

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
50 W. San Fernando, 7th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB
STIPULATION FOR ORDER DISMISSING LAWSUIT WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Fax No.:
916.561.0828
Email: [e-mail]
JEFFREY HO, Bar No. 313361
HEWETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
3000 Hanover Street
Mail Stop 1050
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Fax No.:
Email: [e-mail]

9
10

Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
50 W. San Fernando, 7th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

2.

Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB

STIPULATION FOR ORDER DISMISSING LAWSUIT WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER

1

Plaintiff Betty L. Ravel (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise

2

Company (incorrectly identified as Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Inc. in this lawsuit) (hereafter

3

“HPE”), (Plaintiff and HPE are collectively referred to as the “Parties”), through their respective

4

attorneys of record in this lawsuit, stipulate as follows:

5

Plaintiff and HPE have resolved all of the claims and defenses each Party asserted

6

against the other in the above-entitled lawsuit. The Parties therefore request that the Court dismiss

7

the above-entitled lawsuit with prejudice with each party bearing his/its own litigation costs,

8

expenses and attorneys’ fees.

9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

10

Dated: May 8, 2018
/s/ Benjamin A. Emmert
BENJAMIN A. EMMERT
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY

11
12
13
14

Dated: May 8, 2018

15
/s/ David Graulich
DAVID GRAULICH
LAW PRACTICE OF DAVID GRAULICH
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BETTY L. RAVEL

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
50 W. San Fernando, 7th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

3.

Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB

STIPULATION FOR ORDER DISMISSING LAWSUIT WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER

1

[RDER GRANTING STIPULATION

2

Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Betty L. Ravel (“Plaintiff”) and Hewlett

3

Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”) to dismiss this action with prejudice, the Court Orders as

4

follows:

5

Plaintiff’s lawsuit identified as Case Number 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB is hereby

6

dismissed with prejudice. Each Party shall bear her/its own litigation costs, expenses and attorney

7

fees.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: May 8, 2018

10
11
12
13
14
Firmwide:153342714.1 066902.1115

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
50 W. San Fernando, 7th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

4.

Case No. 2:16−CV−02610−WBS−DB

STIPULATION FOR ORDER DISMISSING LAWSUIT WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER