Hoeft v. Ballon

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/12/2018 DENYING 56 Motion for leave to file a late transcript designation at government's expense. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONICA HOEFT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-02615 CKD (PS) v. ORDER AL BALLON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Judgment was entered in this action on October 3, 2017, and plaintiff, proceeding pro se 18 and in forma pauperis, has filed a notice of appeal. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an 19 order compelling the government to pay for transcripts of the July 19, 2017 hearing on 20 defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 56.) After two rounds of amendment, plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint was dismissed 21 22 with prejudice for failure to state a cognizable claim against defendant. As the standard for 23 requiring the production of transcripts at government expense is not met here, the court will deny 24 plaintiff’s motion. See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511–12 (9th Cir. 1991), 25 overruled on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903, 112 S.Ct. 291 (1991) 26 (reviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that “[p]roduction of the transcript at government 27 expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial 28 //// 1 1 2 judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a late 3 transcript designation at the government’s expense (ECF No. 56) is denied. 4 Dated: February 12, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 / hoeft2615.transcripts 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?