Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. v. Gardner Trucking, Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/22/17: HEARING as to 8 Motion to Remand is RESET for 4/18/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP GREG L. JOHNSON, SB# 132397 E-Mail: Greg.Johnson@lewisbrisbois.com 2 TIMOTHY J. NALLY, SB# 288728 E-Mail: Timothy.Nally@lewisbrisbois.com 3 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700 4 Sacramento, California 95833 Telephone: 916.564.5400 5 Facsimile: 916.564.5444 6 Attorneys for Defendant GARDNER TRUCKING, INC. a California Corporation 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC., 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 GARDNER TRUCKING, INC., a California 15 Corporation and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02623-JAM-CKD AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO REMAND CURRENT DATE: TIME: COURTROOM: March 7, 2017 1:30 p.m. 6 – Judge Mendez PROPOSED DATE: April 18, 2017 TIME: 1:30 p.m. COURTROOM: 6 – Judge Mendez 18 Trial Date: None Set 19 20 21 RECITALS 1. WHEREAS Plaintiff DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC. (“Plaintiff”) 22 initially filed suit against Defendants GARDNER TRUCKING, INC. (“Gardner Trucking”) in San 23 Joaquin County Superior Court; 24 2. WHEREAS, Gardner Trucking filed a petition for removal on November 3, 2016 25 leading to pendency of the Present Action; 26 3. WHEREAS, there is pending in the Fresno Division of this Court the matter of 27 Doctors Medical Center of Modesto v. Gardner Trucking, Inc., Case No. 1:16-cv-01674-DAD- LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR 28 SAB (“the Fresno Action”), which involves different patients, but similar allegations to the above4815-5261-7795.1 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO REMAND 1 captioned litigation; 5. 2 WHEREAS, in the Fresno Action, Gardner Trucking filed a petition for removal, 3 and, on January 10, 2017, the plaintiff moved to remand that action to state court; 6. 4 WHEREAS, on February 7, 2016, the court in the Fresno Action (U.S. District 5 Court Judge Dale A. Drozd) conducted a hearing on the motion to remand filed in that action; 7. 6 WHEREAS, the court in the Fresno action has not yet issued a ruling on the motion 7 to remand filed in that action; 8. 8 WHEREAS, on February 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand in this action, 9 with the hearing scheduled to take place on March 7, 2017; 9. 10 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to 11 remand in this action so as to obtain from the court in the Fresno action a ruling on the motion to 12 remand filed in that action; 10. 13 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that, if the court in the Fresno Action remands 14 the Fresno Action to state court, Gardner Trucking will file a notice of non-opposition to 15 Plaintiff’s motion in the Present Action, in return for which Plaintiff will waive its request for an 16 award of attorney’s fees and costs for the motion to remand in the Present Action; 11. 17 WHEREAS the parties’ stipulation furthers the Court’s and the Parties’ interests in 18 efficiency and consistent rulings, and potentially saves this Court time in researching and writing a 19 decision on the motion to remand in the Present Action; 12. 20 WHEREAS additional time is necessary to obtain the court’s ruling in the Fresno 21 Action. 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR 28 4815-5261-7795.1 STIPULATION 2 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO REMAND 1 THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby 2 stipulate and agree that the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to remand be continued until April 18, 3 2017, and that any opposition and reply papers be filed pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 230 in 4 accordance with such hearing date. 5 6 DATED: February 22, 2016 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 7 8 By: 9 10 11 /s/ Greg L. Johnson Greg L. Johnson Timothy J. Nally Attorneys for Defendant GARDNER TRUCKING, INC. a California Corporation 12 13 DATED: February 22, 2016 HELTON LAW GROUP, APC 14 By: 15 16 17 /s/ Kim Worobec Kim Worobec Attorneys for Plainttiff DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR 28 4815-5261-7795.1 3 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO REMAND 1 ORDER After full consideration of the stipulation filed and good cause appearing therefore, it is 2 3 hereby ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is continued to April 18, 2017 at 1:30 4 p.m. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: 2/22/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez________ 8 HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR 28 4815-5261-7795.1 4 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO REMAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?