Jaime, Jr. v. Albertsons

Filing 8

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/22/17, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Matter REFERRED to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARTHUR BLANQUIZA JAMIE, JR.,

12

No. 2:16-cv-02637 KJM AC

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

ALBERTSONS,

15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the

18

undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On January 12, 2017,

19

this Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint and denied his motion to proceed in forma pauperis

20

(“IFP”). ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was given 30 days to renew his IFP application and file an amended

21

complaint. Id. The Court warned that failure to comply may result in a recommendation to

22

dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. Id. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or

23

renew his IFP application in the allotted time. This court issued an Order to Show Cause why this

24

case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff’s response was due

25

June 21, 2017, and plaintiff failed to respond.

26

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without

27

prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R.

28

Civ. P. 41(b).
1

1

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

2

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14)

3

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

4

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

5

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(b). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

6

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.

7

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

8

DATED: June 22, 2017

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2