Mabey Inc. v. MCM Construction, Inc. et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER to STAY PROCEEDINGS signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/24/2017. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JAMES H. VORHIS (SBN 245034)
jvorhis@nossaman.com
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415.398.3600
Facsimile:
415.398.2438
jvorhis@nossaman.com
HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
KENNETH A. SLAVENS (admitted pro hac vice)
190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600
St. Louis, MO 63105
Phone: (314) 480-1500
Fax: (314) 480-1505
ken.slavens@huschblackwell.com
BRIAN P. WAAGNER (admitted pro hac vice)
750 17th Street N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: (202) 378-2355
Fax: (202) 378-2318
brian.waagner@huschblackwell.com
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff MABEY INC.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
MABEY INC., a Maryland corporation,
Plaintiff,
18
19
JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS
v.
20
Case No. 2:16-cv-02639-JAM-DB
MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., a
California corporation, CITY OF TRACY,
CALIFORNIA, TEICHERT/MCM, a
California joint venture, A.TEICHERT &
SON, INC. d/b/a TEICHERT
CONSTRUCTION, a California
corporation, LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Massachusetts corporation, and
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND
SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a
Connecticut corporation,
21
22
23
24
25
26
Defendants.
27
28
-1STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 2:16-CV-02639-JAM-DB
48872523.V1
1280.006-2290388.1
1
The undersigned counsel, representing Plaintiff Mabey Inc. and the Defendants named in
2
the action, hereby jointly stipulate to a further limited stay of proceedings through March 6, 2017
3
and an extension of the deadline for responsive pleadings to March 16, 2017. This Court
4
previously granted the Parties a 60-day stay to permit settlement negotiations. See ECF No. 19
5
(Order).
6
A further stay is needed to allow the parties to continue ongoing settlement discussions.
7
Representatives of Plaintiff Mabey, Inc. and Defendant MCM Construction, Inc. met in person on
8
February 14, 2017, for the purpose of engaging in settlement discussions. While no settlement
9
was reached at this meeting, counsel for the Parties have subsequently continued settlement
10
discussions, including e-mails exchanged on February 22nd, and the Parties are optimistic that a
11
final settlement can be achieved in the next 10 calendar days. A stay of the pending litigation
12
would facilitate settlement because it would allow the parties to limit their expenditure of
13
attorney’s fees and costs addressing the requirements of the litigation while settlement
14
negotiations are underway.
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 2:16-CV-02639-JAM-DB
48872523.V1
1
Dated: February 24, 2017
2
HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
/s/ Brian Waagner
BRIAN P. WAAGNER
Attorney for Plaintiff MABEY INC.
3
4
Dated: February 23, 2017
5
6
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TRACY
By:/s/ Bill Sartor
BILL SARTOR
City Attorney
Attorney for Defendant CITY OF TRACY
7
8
9
Dated: February 23, 2017
MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP
10
11
By:/s/ D. Michael Schoenfeld
D. MICHAEL SCHOENFELD
J. SCOTT ALEXANDER
MIKHAIL PARNES
Attorneys for Defendants
MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., A. TEICHERT &
SON, INC. d/b/a TEICHERT CONSTRUCTION,
TEICHERT/MCM, LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, and TRAVELERS
CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF
AMERICA
12
13
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
Dated: 2/24/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez
______
Hon. John A. Mendez, U. S. District Court Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 2:16-CV-02639-JAM-DB
48872523.V1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?