Tunstall v. Bodenhamer, et al.

Filing 47

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/12/2017 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 16 Motion. (Hunt, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL, Jr.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-2665 JAM DB P

v.

ORDER

D. BODENHAMER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 12, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the

23

findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 12, 2017, are adopted in full;

3

2. Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion (ECF No. 16) is denied.

4

DATED: 10/12/2017

5

/s/ John A. Mendez
JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DLB:9
tuns2665.804

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2