Tunstall v. Bodenhamer, et al.
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/1/2019 ADVISING plaintiff that documents filed by plaintiff sine the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. If plaintiff feels the conduct complained of amounts to a civil rights violation he may file a new case based on his current treatment after fully exhausting administrative remedies. 78 Motion to Appoint Counsel terminated. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL, Jr.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2665 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
D. BODENHAMER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On January 25, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No.
18
78). This civil rights action was closed on June 6, 2018. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed
19
by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to
20
future filings. Plaintiff is advised that if he feels the conduct complained of amounts to a civil
21
rights violation he may file a new case based on his current treatment after fully exhausting
22
administrative remedies.
23
Dated: February 1, 2019
24
25
26
27
DLB:12
DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner/Civil.Rights/tuns2665.58
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
