Guadarrama v. Landis
Filing
75
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/3/2019 ADOPTED in FULL 66 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTING 47 Motion to Dismiss filed by Randy C. Landis, D. Greenleaf and E. Griffith. GRANTING 50 Fernandez's Motion to Dismiss, and the State law claims are DISMISSED. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE GUADARRAMA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2671 JAM KJN P
v.
ORDER
C. RANDY LEWIS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 20, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 20, 2018, are adopted in full;
3
2. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants Landis, Greenleaf and Griffith (ECF No. 47)
4
is granted;
5
3. Defendant Fernandez’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 50) is granted; and
6
4. The state law claims are dismissed.
7
8
9
10
DATED: June 3, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?