Vail v. City of Sacramento

Filing 12

CONSENT ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/22/2017 REASSIGNING CASE for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, to Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes; VACATING all dates and hearings set before Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that all documents filed hereafter bear case number: 2:16-cv-02673 DB (PS). (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 TERRENCE VAIL, No. 2:16-cv-2673 JAM DB 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. O R D E R 16 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has "Consented 20 to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate." 21 636(a)(5) and (c). See 28 U.S.C. ' According to E.D. Cal. LR. 305, both the district 22 court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve 23 the reference to the magistrate judge. 24 The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that 25 the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate 26 1 1 judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are VACATED. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this 5 case to the Honorable Deborah Barnes, Magistrate Judge. The parties 6 shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the 7 Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:16-cv-2673 DB. 8 Dated: 5/22/2017 /s/John A. Mendez HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 9 10 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case 11 12 for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. 13 DATED: May 24, 2017 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 23 DB/orders/orders.consent/vail2673.consent.ord 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?