Thomas v. Darling et al
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/18/2020 ORDERING, within 14 days, plaintiff shall file: (1) a reply to defendant Darling's 76 response indicating the status of the settlement payment; or (2) a notice to withdraw his motion to amend the settlement agreement if the parties have resolved the matter. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMAAL THOMAS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-02691-JAM-CKD (PC)
v.
ORDER
CHAD DARLING, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
This case was voluntarily dismissed on August 5, 2019 pursuant to the terms of a
18
settlement agreement reached between plaintiff and defendant Darling. ECF No. 73. However,
19
on September18, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion requesting to change the payee who receives the
20
settlement proceeds. ECF No. 75. Defendant Darling filed a response on September 23, 2019
21
indicating that a new payee form was sent to the designated individual and a revised settlement
22
agreement was sent to plaintiff to sign. ECF No. 76. Plaintiff has not filed a reply to defendant
23
Darling’s response.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 14 days from the date of this order
24
25
plaintiff shall file: 1) a reply to defendant Darling’s response indicating the status of the
26
settlement payment; or, 2) a notice to withdraw his motion to amend the settlement agreement if
27
the parties have resolved the matter.
28
/////
1
1
Dated: February 18, 2020
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3
4
5
6
12/thom2691.oscpayee.docx
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?