Robben v. El Dorado County et al

Filing 21

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/8/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TODD ROBBEN,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-2695 MCE KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

EL DORADO COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

By order filed March 14, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

18

to file an amended complaint was granted. On April 21, 2017, plaintiff was granted a ninety day

19

extension of time. On July 25, 2017, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to

20

file an amended complaint, and cautioned that no further extensions of time would be granted.

21

Thirty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

22

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

23
24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

3

(9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: September 8, 2017

5
6
/robb2695.fta.ext

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2