Robben v. El Dorado County et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/07/18 DENYING 13 , 14 Motions to Stay. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TODD ROBBEN, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER EL DORADO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 No. 2:16-CV-2698-JAM-CMK-P / Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions for a stay of proceedings 19 (Docs. 13 and 14). 20 In his first motion for a stay (Doc. 13), plaintiff seeks an order staying “any order 21 dismissing this case.” Because the court has not issued any order dismissing the case, plaintiff’s 22 request will be denied as unnecessary. In his second motion for a stay (Doc. 14), plaintiff seeks 23 an order staying this and a number of other actions pending in this court. Plaintiff states that 24 prison officials have confiscated two boxes of his legal materials and requests that a stay of all 25 his current civil actions “since I cannot even file amended complaint or any other paperwork.” 26 As there are no deadlines currently pending in the instant action, plaintiff’s request will be denied 1 1 2 3 as unnecessary. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for a stay (Docs. 13 and 14) are denied. 4 5 6 7 DATED: August 7, 2018 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?