Robben v. El Dorado County et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/07/18 DENYING 13 , 14 Motions to Stay. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TODD ROBBEN,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
EL DORADO COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
No. 2:16-CV-2698-JAM-CMK-P
/
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions for a stay of proceedings
19
(Docs. 13 and 14).
20
In his first motion for a stay (Doc. 13), plaintiff seeks an order staying “any order
21
dismissing this case.” Because the court has not issued any order dismissing the case, plaintiff’s
22
request will be denied as unnecessary. In his second motion for a stay (Doc. 14), plaintiff seeks
23
an order staying this and a number of other actions pending in this court. Plaintiff states that
24
prison officials have confiscated two boxes of his legal materials and requests that a stay of all
25
his current civil actions “since I cannot even file amended complaint or any other paperwork.”
26
As there are no deadlines currently pending in the instant action, plaintiff’s request will be denied
1
1
2
3
as unnecessary.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for a stay (Docs.
13 and 14) are denied.
4
5
6
7
DATED: August 7, 2018
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?