Ruffino v. United States of America

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/18 ORDERING that the Amended Scheduling Order is APPROVED. Defendant shall file its jurisdictional Motion on or before 5/18/18, and the hearing on Motion is moved from 4/20/18 to 6/15/18 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 3. Discovery is stayed as of 3/23/18. The remainder of the Court's scheduling order (ECF No. 24 remains in effect. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Frederick Schenk, SBN 086392 fschenk@cglaw.com Angela Jae Chun, SBN 248571 ajc@cglaw.com Jillian F. Hayes, SBN 297536 jhayes@cglaw.com CASEY GERRY SCHENK FRANCAVILLA BLATT & PENFIELD, LLP 110 Laurel Street San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 238-1811 Facsimile: (619) 544-9232 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 GIANFRANCO RUFFINO, an individual, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller Dept: Courtroom 3, 15th Floor v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER Defendants. 18 19 CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02719-KLM-CKD Plaintiff Gianfranco Ruffino and Defendant United States of America stipulate and jointly request that the Court modify the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF 24) issued on January 23, 2018. Specifically, the parties request that the Court move the hearing date on Defendant’s jurisdictional motion from April 20, 2015, to June 15, 2018, with the Defendant’s jurisdictional motion to be filed on May 18, 2018. Good cause exists for this request:  Counsel for Plaintiff Angela Jae Chun, Esq. is expecting her second child and is scheduled to be induced on April 17, 2018, due to medical reasons. Ms. 27 Chun’s maternity leave now begins on March 23, 2018. 28 «document_number» Page 1 [TITLE] 1  jurisdictional motion, Plaintiff’s opposing papers are due on April 6, 2018. 2 3 Based on the currently scheduled April 20, 2018, hearing date on Defendant’s  Counsel for Plaintiff’s colleague who will be working on and opposing 4 Defendant’s jurisdictional motion for Ms. Chun while she is on maternity 5 leave is unavailable during the end of March/early April 2018 due to a pre- 6 planned and pre-paid family vacation. 7  oppose Defendant’s jurisdictional motion in Ms. Chun’s absence. 8 9  June 15, 2018 is the first available hearing date on the Court’s calendar on which both parties are available. 10 11 There is no other attorney available at Counsel for Plaintiff’s firm that can Based on the above, the parties stipulate and jointly request the Court modify the 12 Amended Pretrial Order (ECF 24) to move the hearing date on Defendant’s jurisdictional 13 motion from April 20, 2018, to June 15, 2018, with Defendant’s jurisdictional motion to be 14 filed on May 18, 2018. 15 Dated: March 22, 2018 CASEY GERRY SCHENK FRANCAVILLA BLATT & PENFIELD, LLP 16 17 By: /s/ Angela Jae Chun Angela Jae Chun Attorneys for Plaintiff Gianfranco Ruffino 18 19 20 21 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney Dated: March 22, 2018 22 By: 23 /s/ Philip A. Scarborough 24 25 26 27 28 «document_number» Page 2 [TITLE] 1 Philip A. Scarborough Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant United States of America 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 10 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the parties’ stipulation and joint request to modify the 11 Amended Scheduling Order is APPROVED. Defendant shall file its jurisdictional motion 12 on or before May 18, 2018, and the hearing on motion is moved from April 20, 2018 to June 13 15, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 3. Discovery is stayed as of March 23, 2018. The 14 remainder of the Court’s scheduling order (ECF No. 24) remains in effect. 15 DATED: April 3, 2018. 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 «document_number» Page 3 [TITLE]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?