Davenport v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/16/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/19/2017; MODIFYING the Court's Scheduling Order accordingly. (Michel, G.)
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
CSBN 154575
Forslund Law LLC
P.O. Box 4476
Sunriver, OR 97707
Telephone:
541-419-0074
Facsimile:
541-593-4452
Email:
jaf@forslundlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LATISHA SHAMOND DAVENPORT,
)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
)
NANCY E. BERRYHILL,
)
Acting Comm=r of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant
)
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02729-CMK
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE PLAINTIFF=S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to
extend the time 30 days to July 19, 2017, for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment, in
accordance with the Court=s Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff=s second request for an extension,
which is requested because of Plaintiff=s counsel=s health problems and family reasons, both of
which have contributed to a backlog in her workload.
Davenport v. Berryhill
E.D. Cal 2:16-cv-02729-CMK
Stipulation and Proposed Order
The parties further stipulate that the Court=s Scheduling Order be modified
accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: June 12, 2017
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: June 13, 2017
PHILLIP TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
s/ Chantal R. Jenkins
CHANTAL R. JENKINS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization
Attorney for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED
Dated: June 16, 2017
Davenport v. Berryhill
E.D. Cal 2:16-cv-02729-CMK
Stipulation and Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?