Davenport v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/16/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/19/2017; MODIFYING the Court's Scheduling Order accordingly. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND CSBN 154575 Forslund Law LLC P.O. Box 4476 Sunriver, OR 97707 Telephone: 541-419-0074 Facsimile: 541-593-4452 Email: jaf@forslundlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LATISHA SHAMOND DAVENPORT, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) NANCY E. BERRYHILL, ) Acting Comm=r of Social Security, ) ) Defendant ) ) ____________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-02729-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF=S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 30 days to July 19, 2017, for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment, in accordance with the Court=s Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff=s second request for an extension, which is requested because of Plaintiff=s counsel=s health problems and family reasons, both of which have contributed to a backlog in her workload. Davenport v. Berryhill E.D. Cal 2:16-cv-02729-CMK Stipulation and Proposed Order The parties further stipulate that the Court=s Scheduling Order be modified accordingly. Respectfully submitted, Date: June 12, 2017 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney at Law /s/Jacqueline A. Forslund JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney for Plaintiff Date: June 13, 2017 PHILLIP TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration s/ Chantal R. Jenkins CHANTAL R. JENKINS Special Assistant United States Attorney *By email authorization Attorney for Defendant ORDER APPROVED AND SO ORDERED Dated: June 16, 2017 Davenport v. Berryhill E.D. Cal 2:16-cv-02729-CMK Stipulation and Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?