Trost v. Northbay Healthcare Corporation

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/21/18 DENYING 24 Motion for Extension of time.(Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

PATRICIA TROST,

11
12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-2732-KJM-EFB PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

NORTHBAY HEALTHCARE
CORPORATION, and DOES 1 TO 100,
Defendant.

15
16

Plaintiff requests the court continue her deposition, which is was noticed for March 20,
17
2018, and the deposition of a witness, currently scheduled for March 22, 2018, to later dates. The
18

only basis for her request is that she desires additional time to obtain new counsel.1 As for her

19
deposition, the date has already passed and therefore her request is moot. As for the witness’
20
deposition, plaintiff has failed to provide any reason for why the deposition cannot proceed absent
21
counsel.
22
Accordingly, her request to continue depositions, styled as a motion for extension of time
23
(ECF No. 24) is denied.
24
DATED: March 21, 2018.
25
26
27
28

1

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to
Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).