Mason v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/4/2017 ORDERING that defendant's time for responding to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED from 10/4/2017 to 11/20/2017. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration BEATRICE NA, CSBN 303390 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel 160 Spear St Ste 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8967 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-mail: Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 ERICK A. MASON, 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) Case No. 2:16-cv-02734-CKD ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) AN EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 22 counsel of record, that Defendant’s time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 23 Judgment be extended from October 4, 2017 to November 20, 2017. This is Defendant’s first 24 request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 25 Defendant requests this extension due to her counsel’s heavy workload. Defendant’s 26 counsel is currently responsible for conducting discovery in a personnel-related litigation 27 pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, including conducting 28 deposition of Complainant, and responding to an Information Request in an upcoming personnel- 1 related arbitration hearing. Defendant’s counsel is also responsible for a Social Security appeal 2 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and over 40 district court cases in 3 variety of stages, including 8 other cases that require imminent briefing. 4 Defendant’s counsel respectfully requests this additional time to expend the necessary 5 time to review the record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised, and to submit Defendant’s 6 response for review by this Court. 7 8 9 The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly. 10 Respectfully submitted, 11 Dated: October 2, 2017 /s/ Robert C. Weems* (* As authorized via email on October 2, 2017) ROBERT C. WEEMS 12 13 Attorney for Plaintiff 14 15 16 Dated: October 2, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 17 By: 18 19 /s/ Beatrice Na BEATRICE NA Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 20 21 ORDER 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. Dated: October 4, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?