Owens v. Defazio et al

Filing 105

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/17/2018 VACATING plaintiff's 98 motion to compel, without prejudice, to its reinstatement following resolution of defendants' 10/5/2018 motion to compel. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THEON OWENS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P v. ORDER JOSEPH DEGAZIO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 27, 2018, the undersigned granted defendants’ motion to compel 19 and ordered plaintiff to appear for and answer questions at a deposition. (ECF No. 96.) The 20 undersigned also vacated plaintiff’s pending discovery motions until defendants had taken 21 plaintiff’s deposition and plaintiff had complied with a re-noticed request for production of 22 documents. (Id.) On August 10, 2018, plaintiff filed the pending motion to compel defendants to provide 23 24 responses to plaintiff’s written deposition questions. (ECF No. 98.) On October 5, 2018, defendants filed a motion to compel based on plaintiff’s alleged 25 26 failure to provide appropriate responses to defendants’ request for production of documents and 27 defendants’ document request included with the continued deposition notice. (ECF No. 102.) 28 //// 1 1 2 The undersigned finds that defendants’ pending motion to compel should be resolved before the court considers plaintiff’s August 10, 2018 motion to compel. 3 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 10, 2018 4 motion to compel (ECF No. 98) is vacated without prejudice to its reinstatement following 5 resolution of defendants’ October 5, 2018 motion to compel. 6 Dated: October 17, 2018 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ow2750.vac 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?