Owens v. Defazio et al

Filing 140

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/14/19 ORDERING that the order of the Magistrate Judge filed October 7, 2019, is AFFIRMED. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

THEON OWENS,

7
8
9
10

No. 2:16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

JOSEPH DEGAZIO, et al.,
Defendants.

11
12

On October 18, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

13

order filed October 7, 2019, denying plaintiff’s July 16, 2018 and July 20, 2018 motions to

14

compel and April 9, 2019 motion for court assistance to set up depositions by written questions.

15

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

16

erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

17

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

18
19

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
magistrate judge filed October 7, 2019, is affirmed.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: November 14, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE