Owens v. Defazio et al
Filing
237
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/29/2021 REFERRING this matter to the administrator of this District's pro bono panel of attorneys, Sujean Park Castelhano, for the identification of counsel to represent plaintiff at a settlement conference, and GRANTING plaintiff's 231 motion for appointment of counsel, as discussed in this order. (cc: Sujean Park Castelhano) (Yin, K)
Case 2:16-cv-02750-JAM-KJN Document 237 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THEON OWENS,
12
13
14
No. 2: 16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JOSEPH DEFAZIO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 1, 2021, the undersigned directed the parties to inform the court,
19
within twenty-one days of the date of the order, whether they believed a settlement conference
20
would be beneficial. (ECF No. 234.) Both parties responded to the July 1, 2021 order. (ECF
21
Nos. 235, 236.)
22
Upon consideration of the record, the court finds that appointment of counsel is
23
appropriate for the limited purpose of representing plaintiff at the settlement conference. The
24
undersigned will schedule a settlement conference following the appointment of counsel.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. This matter is referred to the administrator of this District’s pro bono panel of
27
attorneys, Sujean Park Castelhano, for the identification of counsel to represent at a
28
settlement conference;
1
Case 2:16-cv-02750-JAM-KJN Document 237 Filed 07/29/21 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 231) is granted, as discussed
in this order.
Dated: July 29, 2021
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Owens2750.app
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?