Owens v. Defazio et al

Filing 237

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/29/2021 REFERRING this matter to the administrator of this District's pro bono panel of attorneys, Sujean Park Castelhano, for the identification of counsel to represent plaintiff at a settlement conference, and GRANTING plaintiff's 231 motion for appointment of counsel, as discussed in this order. (cc: Sujean Park Castelhano) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02750-JAM-KJN Document 237 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THEON OWENS, 12 13 14 No. 2: 16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOSEPH DEFAZIO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 1, 2021, the undersigned directed the parties to inform the court, 19 within twenty-one days of the date of the order, whether they believed a settlement conference 20 would be beneficial. (ECF No. 234.) Both parties responded to the July 1, 2021 order. (ECF 21 Nos. 235, 236.) 22 Upon consideration of the record, the court finds that appointment of counsel is 23 appropriate for the limited purpose of representing plaintiff at the settlement conference. The 24 undersigned will schedule a settlement conference following the appointment of counsel. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. This matter is referred to the administrator of this District’s pro bono panel of 27 attorneys, Sujean Park Castelhano, for the identification of counsel to represent at a 28 settlement conference; 1 Case 2:16-cv-02750-JAM-KJN Document 237 Filed 07/29/21 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 231) is granted, as discussed in this order. Dated: July 29, 2021 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Owens2750.app 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?