Owens v. Defazio et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/18/17 ordering plaintiff's motion for clarification 27 is deemed resolved. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THEON OWENS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P
v.
ORDER
JOSEPH DEFAZIO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
17
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the Post-Screening ADR Project, this action is set for a
19
settlement conference before the undersigned on June 13, 2017.
On April 10, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for clarification. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff
20
21
requests clarification regarding whether his settlement conference statement is required to be
22
confidential or non-confidential.
If plaintiff would like to share information with opposing counsel for the purpose of
23
24
settlement, he may submit a non-confidential settlement conference statement. If plaintiff would
25
like to share information with the undersigned only for the purpose of settlement, he may submit
26
a confidential settlement conference statement. Plaintiff is not prohibited from submitting both
27
confidential and non-confidential settlement conference statements.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for clarification (ECF
2
No. 27) is deemed resolved.
3
Dated: April 18, 2017
4
5
Ow2750.ord
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?