Owens v. Defazio et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/18/17 ordering plaintiff's motion for clarification 27 is deemed resolved. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THEON OWENS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2: 16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P

v.

ORDER

JOSEPH DEFAZIO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant

17
18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the Post-Screening ADR Project, this action is set for a

19

settlement conference before the undersigned on June 13, 2017.
On April 10, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for clarification. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff

20
21

requests clarification regarding whether his settlement conference statement is required to be

22

confidential or non-confidential.
If plaintiff would like to share information with opposing counsel for the purpose of

23
24

settlement, he may submit a non-confidential settlement conference statement. If plaintiff would

25

like to share information with the undersigned only for the purpose of settlement, he may submit

26

a confidential settlement conference statement. Plaintiff is not prohibited from submitting both

27

confidential and non-confidential settlement conference statements.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for clarification (ECF

2

No. 27) is deemed resolved.

3

Dated: April 18, 2017

4
5
Ow2750.ord
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2