Owens v. Defazio et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/19/2017; ADOPTING in FULL 6 Findings and Recommendations; The defendant Dental is DISMISSED. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THEON OWENS,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JOSEPH DEFAZIO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 8, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On December 21, 2016
23
Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 11.) On February
24
22, 2017, plaintiff filed exhibits in support of his objections. (ECF No. 21.)
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 8, 2016, are adopted in full; and
3
2. The defendant Dental Department is dismissed.
4
DATED: April 19, 2017
5
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?