Heinzler v. Synthes Inc. et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/23/2017 ORDERING that this action is voluntarily DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE Hunter Pyle (SBN 191125) Chad Saunders (SBN 257810) 428 Thirteenth Street, Eighth Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 663-9240 Facsimile: (510) 663-9241 Email(s): hpyle@ssrplaw.com; csaunders@ssrplaw.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Heinzler 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BLANK ROME LLP Michael L. Ludwig (SBN 173850) Ludwig@BlankRome.com Caroline P. Donelan (SBN 268762) CDonelan@BlankRome.com 2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 424.239.3400 Facsimile: 424.239.3434 Attorneys for Defendants, Synthes, Inc., DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., and Synthes USA Sales, LLC 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 TODD HEINZLER, Case No.: 2:16-cv-02756-JAM-EFB 21 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 22 23 24 25 26 v. SYNTHES, INC.; DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; and SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC, Defendants. 27 28 Case No. 2:16-cv-02756-JAM-EFB STIPULATION OF DIMISSAL 1 1 2 It is stipulated by the parties that this action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. DATED: March 23, 2017 /s/ Chad Saunders 6 Attorney for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 DATED: March 23, 2017 /s/ Caroline P. Donelan 10 Attorney for Defendants 11 12 (As authorized on 2/22/17; L.R. 131(e)) IT IS SO ORDERED: 13 14 DATED: 3/23/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez 15 Hon. John A. Mendez 16 United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:16-cv-02756-JAM-EFB STIPULATION OF DIMISSAL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?