Heinzler v. Synthes Inc. et al
Filing
48
STIPULATION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/23/2017 ORDERING that this action is voluntarily DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE
Hunter Pyle (SBN 191125)
Chad Saunders (SBN 257810)
428 Thirteenth Street, Eighth Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 663-9240
Facsimile: (510) 663-9241
Email(s): hpyle@ssrplaw.com; csaunders@ssrplaw.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Todd Heinzler
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
BLANK ROME LLP
Michael L. Ludwig (SBN 173850)
Ludwig@BlankRome.com
Caroline P. Donelan (SBN 268762)
CDonelan@BlankRome.com
2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: 424.239.3400
Facsimile: 424.239.3434
Attorneys for Defendants,
Synthes, Inc., DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.,
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.,
and Synthes USA Sales, LLC
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
TODD HEINZLER,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02756-JAM-EFB
21
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
22
23
24
25
26
v.
SYNTHES, INC.; DEPUY SYNTHES SALES,
INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES,
INC.; and SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC,
Defendants.
27
28
Case No. 2:16-cv-02756-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION OF DIMISSAL
1
1
2
It is stipulated by the parties that this action is voluntarily dismissed with
prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3
4
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
DATED: March 23, 2017
/s/ Chad Saunders
6
Attorney for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
DATED: March 23, 2017
/s/ Caroline P. Donelan
10
Attorney for Defendants
11
12
(As authorized on 2/22/17; L.R. 131(e))
IT IS SO ORDERED:
13
14
DATED: 3/23/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez
15
Hon. John A. Mendez
16
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:16-cv-02756-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION OF DIMISSAL
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?