Basque et al. v. County of Placer et al.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/17, ORDERING that a hearing on plaintiffs' pending 17 Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses is SET for 3/9/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Any opposition to the motion to strike shall be filed no later than 2/9/2017. Any reply brief shall be due no later than 2/23/2017. An Initial Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 3/9/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. No later than 2/23/2017, the parties shall file a joint status report. (Kastilahn, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RYAN D. BASQUE & DENISE M.
No. 2:16-cv-2760 KJN
COUNTY OF PLACER, et al.,
On January 26, 2017, after all parties consented to proceed before a United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), this case was referred to the undersigned for all
further proceedings, including the entry of final judgment. (ECF No. 18.) Accordingly, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. A hearing on plaintiffs’ pending motion to strike affirmative defenses is set for March
9, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25.
2. Any opposition to the motion to strike shall be filed no later than February 9, 2017.
3. Any reply brief shall be due no later than February 23, 2017.
4. An initial status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this matter is set for March 9,
2017, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25.
5. No later than February 23, 2017, the parties shall file a joint status report addressing
the following topics:
a. Service of process;
b. Possible joinder of additional parties;
c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;
d. Jurisdiction and venue;
e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;
f. The report required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 outlining the proposed discovery plan
and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;
g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and
law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;
h. Special procedures, if any;
i. Estimated trial time;
j. Modifications of standard pretrial procedures due to the simplicity or complexity
of the proceedings;
k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;
l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;
m. Whether counsel will stipulate to the undersigned acting as a settlement judge and
trial judge, and waive disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer
to have a settlement conference conducted before another judge; and
n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 26, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?