(CONSENT) Basque et al. v. County of Placer et al.

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/17, ORDERING that a hearing on plaintiffs' pending #17 Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses is SET for 3/9/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Any opposition to the motion to strike shall be filed no later than 2/9/2017. Any reply brief shall be due no later than 2/23/2017. An Initial Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 3/9/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. No later than 2/23/2017, the parties shall file a joint status report. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

RYAN D. BASQUE & DENISE M.
BASQUE,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:16-cv-2760 KJN

ORDER
v.
COUNTY OF PLACER, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

On January 26, 2017, after all parties consented to proceed before a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), this case was referred to the undersigned for all

20

further proceedings, including the entry of final judgment. (ECF No. 18.) Accordingly, IT IS

21

HEREBY ORDERED that:

22
23

1. A hearing on plaintiffs’ pending motion to strike affirmative defenses is set for March
9, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25.

24

2. Any opposition to the motion to strike shall be filed no later than February 9, 2017.

25

3. Any reply brief shall be due no later than February 23, 2017.

26

4. An initial status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this matter is set for March 9,

27
28

2017, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25.
5. No later than February 23, 2017, the parties shall file a joint status report addressing
1

1

the following topics:

2

a. Service of process;

3

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

4

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

5

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

6

e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;

7

f. The report required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 outlining the proposed discovery plan

8

and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;

9

g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and

10

law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

11

h. Special procedures, if any;

12

i. Estimated trial time;

13

j. Modifications of standard pretrial procedures due to the simplicity or complexity

14

of the proceedings;

15

k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;

16

l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;

17

m. Whether counsel will stipulate to the undersigned acting as a settlement judge and

18

trial judge, and waive disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer

19

to have a settlement conference conducted before another judge; and

20

n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this case.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 26, 2017

23
24
25
26
27
28
2