Dean v. Combs et al.
Filing
3
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/1/2016 ORDERING that plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. No later than 12/14/2016, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL DEAN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2776 TLN CKD PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND
STEVE COMBS, et al.,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to
18
28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by
19
Local Rule 302(c)(21).
20
Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable
21
to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma
22
pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
23
In the complaint, plaintiff complains about what appears to be a breach of contract dispute
24
involving landscaping services. The complaint, however, does not allege a basis for subject
25
matter jurisdiction in this court other than citing “federal question” jurisdiction, without setting a
26
proper basis therefor. The complaint only cites “$2,000,000” as the basis for federal question
27
jurisdiction. The federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. In the absence of a basis for
28
federal jurisdiction, plaintiff’s claims cannot proceed in this venue. Because there is no basis for
1
1
federal subject matter jurisdiction evident in the complaint, and diversity jurisdiction is lacking,
2
plaintiff will be ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Failure to allege
3
a proper basis for subject matter jurisdiction will result in a recommendation that the action be
4
dismissed.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is granted;
7
2. No later than December 14, 2016, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should
8
not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
9
Dated: December 1, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
4 dean2776.ifp.nosmj
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?