Mancinas v. Brown, et al.

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/9/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 22 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHRISTOPHER MANCINAS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-2806-EFB P

v.

ORDER

EDMOND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

17
18

U.S.C. § 1983. He requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to

19

require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States

20

Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an

21

attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v.

22

Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th

23

Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must

24

consider the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate

25

his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560

26

F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Having considered those factors, the court finds there are no

27

exceptional circumstances in this case.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for appointment of

2

counsel (ECF No. 22) is denied.

3

DATED: May 9, 2018.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2