Wells v. Lizarraga
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/21/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 33 Findings and Recommendations. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and the court DECLINES to issue the Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER KELLY WELLS,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2807 WBS AC P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
JOE A. LIZARRAGA,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On February 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 33. After
23
receiving an extension of time, petitioner filed timely objections to the findings and
24
recommendations. ECF No. 36.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2022 (ECF No. 33), are adopted
3
in full;
4
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; and
5
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C.
6
§ 2253.
7
8
Dated: April 21, 2022
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
/well2807.805hc
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?