Wells v. Lizarraga

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/21/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 33 Findings and Recommendations. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and the court DECLINES to issue the Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER KELLY WELLS, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2807 WBS AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER JOE A. LIZARRAGA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 33. After 23 receiving an extension of time, petitioner filed timely objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. ECF No. 36. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2022 (ECF No. 33), are adopted 3 in full; 4 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; and 5 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 6 § 2253. 7 8 Dated: April 21, 2022 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 /well2807.805hc 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?