Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation

Filing 48

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/18/19 GRANTING 44 Motion to Stay. Not later than 60 days following the date this Order is electronically filed, and every 60 days thereafter until the appeals in 3:17-cv- 02454-WHA and 8:18-cv-01615-DOC-DFM have been resolved, the parties shall submit a Joint Status Report reporting the status of those appellate cases. Defendant's 42 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice to refiling once the stay is lifted. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Scott Johnson, 11 Case No. 2:16-cv-02820-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, 12 ORDER v. 13 14 Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation; and Does 110, 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion to Stay (ECF No. 44) this action is GRANTED. Not later than sixty days following the date this Order is electronically filed, and every sixty days thereafter until the appeals in 3:17-cv02454-WHA and 8:18-cv-01615-DOC-DFM have been resolved, the parties shall submit a Joint Status Report reporting the status of those appellate cases. /// /// /// 28 ORDER 1 Case No. 2:16-cv-02820-MCE-KJN 1 2 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling once the stay is lifted. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: June 18, 2019 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER 2 Case No. 2:16-cv-02820-MCE-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?