Regents of the University of California v. Stidham Trucking, Inc.,

Filing 44

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/12/2017 DISMISSING Craig C. Hansen Insurance Services, Inc. with prejudice and DENYING 41 Motion as moot. (Hunt, G)

Leibovic Law Group, LLP

1 Gariann M. Weisenberg, Esq. (#152742)
2 21540 Plummer Street, Suite B
3
4

Chatsworth, California 91311
Telephone: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Regents of the University of California,

5 a Public Trust Corporation on behalf of UC Davis Health System
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 REGENTS of the UNIVERSITY of

Case No. 2:16-cv-02835 – MCE-CKD

13

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT, CRAIG C. HANSEN
INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.

CALIFORNIA, a Public Trust Corporation,
12 on behalf of UC DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM,
Plaintiff,
vs.

14

15 STIDHAM TRUCKING INC., a California

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, jr.
Magistrate Judge: Hon. Carolyn K.
Delaney

Corporation; CRAIG C. HANSEN

16 INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a
California Corporation; WORTHINGTON

17 OLSON, INC. a California Corporation dba
18 COBRAHELP; BLUE CROSS OF
CALIFORNIA, dba ANTHEM BLUE

19 CROSS, a California Corporation and
20

DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

21

Defendants.

22
23
24

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR

25 ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
26 ///
27 ///
28
1

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

1

Plaintiff, Regents of the University of California, a Public Trust Corporation, on

2 behalf of UC Davis Health System, by and through their counsel of record, herein
3 requests that the Court dismiss Defendant, Craig C. Hansen Insurance Services, Inc.,
4 with prejudice, from the above entitled matter.
5
6
7

Dated: December 7, 2017

Leibovic Law Group, LLP

8

/s/ Gariann M. Weisenberg
Attorney for Plaintiff

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing, this Court dismisses Defendant Craig C. Hansen
Insurance Services, Inc., with prejudice, from the above-captioned matter. In light of this
dismissal, Defendant’s Motion, ECF No. 41, is DENIED as moot.
This case shall remain open pending the Court’s forthcoming order addressing
Defendant Worthington Olsen’s Statement of Attorneys’ Fees in Connection with the
Court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

20 Dated: December 12, 2017
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL