Foster v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/23/17 ORDERING that this Action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees; The Court shall retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Settlement Agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Thomas Watson, City Attorney, SBN 144457 Helen Burkart, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 305212 1901 Airport Road, Suite 300 South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 (530) 542-6046; FAX (530) 542-6173 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02840-JAM-EFB DAVID FOSTER, an individual, ORDER Plaintiff, vs. Action Filed: 12/02/2016 Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez Courtroom: 6, 14th Floor CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a California municipal corporation, NANCY KERRY, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20 Defendant. 15 16 17 After reviewing the Settlement Agreement attached to and incorporated by reference therein to 18 Defendant City of South Lake Tahoe’s Request for Dismissal, both signed and fully executed by and 19 between the parties and their counsel of record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 20 1. This action is dismissed with prejudice; 21 2. Each party will bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees; 22 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Settlement Agreement. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: 6/23/2017 26 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02840-JAM-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?