Foster v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/23/17 ORDERING that this Action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees; The Court shall retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Settlement Agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR
THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Thomas Watson, City Attorney, SBN 144457
Helen Burkart, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 305212
1901 Airport Road, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
(530) 542-6046; FAX (530) 542-6173
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02840-JAM-EFB
DAVID FOSTER, an individual,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
vs.
Action Filed: 12/02/2016
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
Courtroom: 6, 14th Floor
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a California
municipal corporation, NANCY KERRY, an
individual; and DOES 1 through 20
Defendant.
15
16
17
After reviewing the Settlement Agreement attached to and incorporated by reference therein to
18
Defendant City of South Lake Tahoe’s Request for Dismissal, both signed and fully executed by and
19
between the parties and their counsel of record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
20
1. This action is dismissed with prejudice;
21
2. Each party will bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees;
22
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Settlement Agreement.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: 6/23/2017
26
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02840-JAM-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?