Zwirn v. Ruggiero

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/6/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 16 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID ZWIRN,

12

No. 2:16-cv-2853 CKD P
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

A. RUGGIERO,

15

ORDER

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has requested

18

appointment of counsel. The court cannot require an attorney to represent a plaintiff who cannot

19

pay for the attorney’s services. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989).

20

However, under the federal in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the court may request

21

that an attorney represent a person unable to afford counsel. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). The court

22

will make that request only when there are exceptional circumstances. When determining

23

whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court considers, among other things, plaintiff's

24

likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro

25

se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970

26

(9th Cir. 2009). While the court is aware of the difficulties attendant to litigating an action while

27

incarcerated, circumstances common to most prisoners do not establish “exceptional

28

circumstances.”

1
2
3

In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances at this
stage of these proceedings.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

4

counsel (ECF No. 16) is denied.

5

Dated: June 6, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10

1/bh
zwir2853.31(1)

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2