Timber Ridge Homeowners Association v. Centimark Corporation

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 02/07/18 ORDERING that the date for exchanging expert disclosures is EXTENDED to 02/23/18; the date for exchanging rebuttal expert disclosures is EXTENDED to 03/02/18. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 KATHLEEN M. RHOADS (SBN: 144466) GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 565-2900 Facsimile: (916) 920-4402 Email: krhoads@grsm.com Attorneys for Defendant CENTIMARK CORPORATION 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TIMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, ) ) ) Plaintiff and ) Counter-Defendant, ) ) vs. ) ) CENTIMARK CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant and ) Counter-Claimant. ) _______________________________________) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES TIMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (“Plaintiff”) and CENTIMARK CORPORATION (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate, by and through their attorneys of record: WHEREAS the current date for exchanging expert disclosures under Federal Rule of 21 Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2) is set for February 9, 2018, pursuant to the Status (Pre-trial 22 Scheduling) Order in this case entered on March 16, 2017; 23 24 25 WHEREAS the current date for exchanging expert rebuttal disclosures is set for February 16, 2018, pursuant to the Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order; WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant agree that expert discovery and efficiency in this 26 case will benefit from extending the time to disclose experts and rebuttal experts and that good 27 cause exists to extend the time for exchanging such disclosures; 28 -1Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Disclosures 2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC 1 WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant do not intend for any other dates or deadlines in the 2 Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order to be affected by this stipulation, including the discovery cut- 3 off set for April 13, 2018; 4 Plaintiff and Defendant STIPULATE and AGREE: 5 1. The date for exchanging expert disclosures as required under Federal Rule of 6 Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2), including all information required under Rule 7 26(a)(2)(B), shall be extended two weeks until February 23, 2018. 8 9 2. The date for exchanging rebuttal expert disclosures shall be extended to March 2, 2018. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 12 13 14 Dated: February 7, 2018 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 15 /s/ Kathleen M. Rhoads By:______________________________________ KATHLEEN M. RHOADS Attorney for Defendant CENTIMARK CORPORATION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: February 6, 2018 BERDING & WEIL LLP /s/ Jacob A. Moss By:_______________________________________ JACOB A. MOSS Attorney for Plaintiff TIMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 24 25 26 27 28 -2Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Disclosures 2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC ORDER 1 2 3 4 Having reviewed the foregoing stipulation of the parties and finding good cause therefor, the Court hereby orders as follows: 1. The date for exchanging expert disclosures as required under Federal Rule of 5 Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2), including all information required under Rule 6 26(a)(2)(B), shall be extended two weeks until February 23, 2017. 7 8 2. The date for exchanging rebuttal expert disclosures shall be extended to March 2, 2018. 9 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: 2/7/2018 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Disclosures 2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?