Timber Ridge Homeowners Association v. Centimark Corporation
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 02/07/18 ORDERING that the date for exchanging expert disclosures is EXTENDED to 02/23/18; the date for exchanging rebuttal expert disclosures is EXTENDED to 03/02/18. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
KATHLEEN M. RHOADS (SBN: 144466)
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
655 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 565-2900
Facsimile: (916) 920-4402
Email: krhoads@grsm.com
Attorneys for Defendant
CENTIMARK CORPORATION
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
655 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
TIMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION,
)
)
)
Plaintiff and
)
Counter-Defendant, )
)
vs.
)
)
CENTIMARK CORPORATION,
)
)
Defendant and
)
Counter-Claimant. )
_______________________________________)
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR EXPERT
DISCLOSURES
TIMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (“Plaintiff”) and CENTIMARK
CORPORATION (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate, by and through their attorneys of record:
WHEREAS the current date for exchanging expert disclosures under Federal Rule of
21
Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2) is set for February 9, 2018, pursuant to the Status (Pre-trial
22
Scheduling) Order in this case entered on March 16, 2017;
23
24
25
WHEREAS the current date for exchanging expert rebuttal disclosures is set for
February 16, 2018, pursuant to the Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order;
WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant agree that expert discovery and efficiency in this
26
case will benefit from extending the time to disclose experts and rebuttal experts and that good
27
cause exists to extend the time for exchanging such disclosures;
28
-1Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Disclosures
2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC
1
WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant do not intend for any other dates or deadlines in the
2
Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order to be affected by this stipulation, including the discovery cut-
3
off set for April 13, 2018;
4
Plaintiff and Defendant STIPULATE and AGREE:
5
1.
The date for exchanging expert disclosures as required under Federal Rule of
6
Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2), including all information required under Rule
7
26(a)(2)(B), shall be extended two weeks until February 23, 2018.
8
9
2.
The date for exchanging rebuttal expert disclosures shall be extended to March 2,
2018.
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
655 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
10
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
12
13
14
Dated: February 7, 2018
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
15
/s/ Kathleen M. Rhoads
By:______________________________________
KATHLEEN M. RHOADS
Attorney for Defendant CENTIMARK
CORPORATION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: February 6, 2018
BERDING & WEIL LLP
/s/ Jacob A. Moss
By:_______________________________________
JACOB A. MOSS
Attorney for Plaintiff TIMBER RIDGE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
24
25
26
27
28
-2Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Disclosures
2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC
ORDER
1
2
3
4
Having reviewed the foregoing stipulation of the parties and finding good cause therefor,
the Court hereby orders as follows:
1.
The date for exchanging expert disclosures as required under Federal Rule of
5
Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2), including all information required under Rule
6
26(a)(2)(B), shall be extended two weeks until February 23, 2017.
7
8
2.
The date for exchanging rebuttal expert disclosures shall be extended to March 2,
2018.
9
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
655 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: 2/7/2018
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Disclosures
2:16-cv-02858-JAM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?