Vasquez v. Muniz
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/15/17 ordering respondent's consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes 8 is deemed revoked. The clerk of court is directed to indicate on the docket that: a. Respondent's consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes shall be disregarded. Respondent's decline of jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes 9 is duly noted; and this case shall no longer be designated a "consent case." The clerk of court is further directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb randomly assigned to this action. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ENRIQUE VASQUEZ,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2861 AC P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
WILLIAM MUNIZ,
Respondent.
16
17
This action proceeds on petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
18
U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent informs the court that he inadvertently filed a consent to the
19
jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes, and requests that
20
his consent be deemed amended to decline jurisdiction. Respondent explains that, “Petitioner was
21
sentenced in state court to an aggregate term of 84 years and an indeterminate term of 100 years
22
to life in state prison. Given the length of Petitioner’s sentence, it is the practice of the California
23
Attorney General not to consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct
24
all proceedings. Thus, Respondent respectfully requests that the previously filed consent be
25
amended to decline jurisdiction.” ECF No. 9 at 1-2.
26
For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. Respondent’s consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate
28
Judge for all purposes, ECF No. 8, is deemed revoked.
1
1
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to indicate on the docket that:
2
3
a. Respondent’s consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States
Magistrate Judge for all purposes, ECF No. 8, shall be disregarded;
4
5
b. Respondent’s decline of jurisdiction of the undersigned United States
Magistrate Judge for all purposes, ECF No. 9, is duly noted; and
6
7
8
9
10
c. This case shall no longer be designated a “consent case.”
3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge
to this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 15, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?