Essex v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/14/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Reply to the 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by 9/26/2017. (Michel, G.)

1

4

SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202
Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP
42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff

2
3

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO BRANCH

9

RRONA DEANNE ESSEX,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12
13

vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

14
15
16

Case No.: 2:16-CV-02869-CKD

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER
EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
FILE A REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

Defendant
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective

17

undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff’s time to file a Reply to

18

Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby

19

extended from the present due date of September 12, 2017, by fourteen days, to the new due date

20

of September 26, 2017. This extension is requested because the writer is currently in

21

Jacksonville, Florida, and may have to evacuate due to incoming Hurricane Irma.

22

DATED: September 7, 2017

23

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

24
25
26
27
28

/s/ Shellie Lott
SHELLIE LOTT,
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/Ben A Porter
BEN A. PORTER,
(As authorized via E-mail on 9/7/17)
Special Assistant U S Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

1

4

SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202
Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP
42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff

2
3

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO BRANCH

9
10
11

RRONA DEANNE ESSEX,
Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.

14

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

15

Case No.: 2:16-cv-02869-CKD

16

[proposed] ORDER EXTENDING
PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE A REPLY
TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant

17
18

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties for a requested first extension of Plaintiff’s time

19

to file a Reply to Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, the request is hereby

20

APPROVED.

21
22
23

Plaintiff shall file her Reply to Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on or
before September 26, 2017.
SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 14, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE