Johnson v. The Burke Company, LLC et al
Filing
51
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/18. The court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days (1) why this court should not sanction Plaintiff $250.00 for failing to heed the court's instruction; and/or (2) why the court should not dismiss this case against defendant Raffs for failure to prosecute. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:16-CV-02881 KJM AC
ORDER
v.
THE BURKE COMPANY, LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company;
RODELYN GARGANTILLA RAFFS;
DEOK NAM KIM; JAE JUNG KIM;
ISABEL U. RODRIGUEZ; MOSES
ELIMAR RODRIGUEZ; and DOES 1-10,
18
Defendants.
19
All but one defendant has been terminated from this case. See ECF Nos. 44, 50.
20
21
The Clerk entered default against the sole remaining defendant, Rodelyn Gargantilla Raffs, over a
22
year ago, ECF No. 20 (Mar. 8, 2017), yet plaintiff has since taken no action regarding this
23
defendant. To keep this case moving, the court issued a minute order on September 25, 2017,
24
directing plaintiff to file a declaration as to the status of defendant Raffs or a motion for default
25
judgment against defendant Raffs by October 6, 2017, and warning that failure to heed this
26
instruction may result in sanctions. ECF No. 46. Plaintiff did neither.
27
////
28
////
1
1
The court therefore ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14)
2
days (1) why this court should not sanction plaintiff $250.00 for failing to heed the court’s
3
instruction; and/or (2) why the court should not dismiss this case against defendant Raffs for
4
failure to prosecute.
5
DATED: April 3, 2018.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?