Kauffman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/16/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/5/2017. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB#103726 5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1 Carmichael, CA 95608 916/488-3030 916/489-9297 fax 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff SARAH KAUFFMAN 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 -o0O0o- 11 12 13 SARAH KAUFFMAN, No. 2:16-CV-02883-CMK 14 Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 17 18 19 20 v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________________/ 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 23 undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff’s time to file a motion 24 for summary judgment is extended to July 5, 2017. 25 This is a first extension but after the due-date under the scheduling order. The extension 26 27 28 is caused by plaintiff’s counsel’s work-schedule including federal court briefs. The stipulation was agreed to before the Court’s order to show cause issued. [Pleading Title] - 1 1 2 3 Dated: June 14, 2017 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: June 14, 2017 /s/ per e-mail authorization 12 MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of 20 plaintiff’s time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to July 5, 2017. 21 SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 Dated: June 16, 2017 25 26 27 28 [Pleading Title] - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?