Kauffman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/16/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/5/2017. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB#103726
5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1
Carmichael, CA 95608
916/488-3030
916/489-9297 fax
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
SARAH KAUFFMAN
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
-o0O0o-
11
12
13
SARAH KAUFFMAN,
No.
2:16-CV-02883-CMK
14
Plaintiff,
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
16
17
18
19
20
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
_______________________________________/
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective
23
undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff’s time to file a motion
24
for summary judgment is extended to July 5, 2017.
25
This is a first extension but after the due-date under the scheduling order. The extension
26
27
28
is caused by plaintiff’s counsel’s work-schedule including federal court briefs. The stipulation
was agreed to before the Court’s order to show cause issued.
[Pleading Title] - 1
1
2
3
Dated: June 14, 2017
/s/ Jesse S. Kaplan
JESSE S. KAPLAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
5
6
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: June 14, 2017
/s/ per e-mail authorization
12
MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
18
19
For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of
20
plaintiff’s time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to July 5, 2017.
21
SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
Dated: June 16, 2017
25
26
27
28
[Pleading Title] - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?