Kauffman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/4/17 GRANTING the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a reply brief. Plaintiff's reply filed on October 2, 2017, is considered timely. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB#103726 5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1 Carmichael, CA 95608 916/488-3030 916/489-9297 fax 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff SARAH KAUFFMAN 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 -o0O0o- 11 12 13 SARAH KAUFFMAN, No. 2:16-CV-02883-CMK 14 Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF 16 17 18 19 20 v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________________/ 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 23 undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff’s time to file a reply 24 brief is extended. Plaintiff’s reply brief, filed on October 2, 2017, is considered timely. 25 This is a first extension of one business day caused by personal circumstances and a large 26 27 28 number of hearings and prehearing briefs required of plaintiff’s counsel in the week leading to the present due-date. [Pleading Title] - 1 1 2 3 Dated: September 28, 2017 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: September 28, 2017 /s/ per e-mail authorization 12 BEN PORTER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 20 21 For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff’s time to file a reply brief is granted. Plaintiff’s reply filed on October 2, 2017, is considered timely. 22 SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: October 4, 2017 25 26 27 28 [Pleading Title] - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?