Kauffman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/4/17 GRANTING the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a reply brief. Plaintiff's reply filed on October 2, 2017, is considered timely. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB#103726
5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1
Carmichael, CA 95608
916/488-3030
916/489-9297 fax
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
SARAH KAUFFMAN
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
-o0O0o-
11
12
13
SARAH KAUFFMAN,
No.
2:16-CV-02883-CMK
14
Plaintiff,
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S
REPLY BRIEF
16
17
18
19
20
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
_______________________________________/
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective
23
undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff’s time to file a reply
24
brief is extended. Plaintiff’s reply brief, filed on October 2, 2017, is considered timely.
25
This is a first extension of one business day caused by personal circumstances and a large
26
27
28
number of hearings and prehearing briefs required of plaintiff’s counsel in the week leading to
the present due-date.
[Pleading Title] - 1
1
2
3
Dated: September 28, 2017
/s/ Jesse S. Kaplan
JESSE S. KAPLAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
5
6
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: September 28, 2017
/s/ per e-mail authorization
12
BEN PORTER
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
18
19
20
21
For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of
plaintiff’s time to file a reply brief is granted. Plaintiff’s reply filed on October 2, 2017, is
considered timely.
22
SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: October 4, 2017
25
26
27
28
[Pleading Title] - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?