Privett, Jr. v. Rash Curtis and Associates

Filing 6

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge George H. Wu on 12/20/2016 re Transfer of Case. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. 2:16-cv-2886-GHW Title Samuel Privett, Jr. v. Rash Curtis and Associates Present: The Honorable Date December 20, 2016 GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Javier Gonzalez None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE WU This action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU, United States District Judge. Please substitute the initials GHW in place of the initials MCE. The case number will now read: 2:16-cv-02886-GHW. As documents are routed using the judge’s initials, it is important to use the correct initials on all subsequent filings. Judge Wu’s Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Javier Gonzalez, can be reached at (213)894-0191 or at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov. Judge Wu is located in Courtroom 9D, at the First Street Courthouse, 350 W. First Street, 9th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Additional information about Judge Wu’s procedures and schedule can be found on the Court’s website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff will provide a copy of the Complaint to chambers pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.5. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.5 - A mandatory chambers copy of every electronically filed document must be delivered to the chambers of the assigned judge, or other designated location, no later than 12:00 noon on the following business day. Copies shall be delivered to Judge Wu's mail box outside the Clerk's Office on the 4th Floor of the First Street Courthouse. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL JG Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?