California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. United States of America
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/1/2017 ORDERING that the matter is STAYED until 4/18/2018. The deadline for the parties to lodge a proposed Consent Decree is EXTENDED to 12/15/2017. In the event that a proposed Consent Decree cannot be filed with the Court by 12/15/2017, the parties agree to file a Supplemental Joint Status Report notifying the Court of the status of the approvals. (Zignago, K.)
Case 2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC Document 12 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
JEFFREY H. WOOD
Acting Assistant Attorney General
MARK A. RIGAU, State Bar No. 223610
Senior Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Environment and Natural Resources Division
301 Howard Street, Suite 1050
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415-744-6487
Facsimile: 415-744-6476
E-mail: Mark.Rigau@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States of America
7
8
9
10
11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC
SUBSTANCES CONTROL,
2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC
JOINT STATUS REPORT,
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STAY
17
18
v.
19
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
Action Filed: December 9, 2016
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Status Report, Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC)
Case 2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC Document 12 Filed 11/30/17 Page 2 of 5
1
Plaintiff, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC”) and Defendant, the
2
United States of America (“United States”) hereby submit this Joint Status Report, Stipulation
3
and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay and to postpone the deadline for dispositional papers.
4
Dispositional papers are currently due on or before December 1, 2017. DTSC and the United
5
States stipulate to a deadline to lodge a proposed Consent Decree by December 15, 2017.
6
BACKGROUND
7
On or about December 9, 2016, DTSC initiated the above-captioned case, seeking cost
8
recovery and declaratory relief under sections 107(a) and 113(g) of the Comprehensive
9
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a)
10
and 9613(g). The matter concerns the properties known as 711 and 750 Jackson Street, Benicia,
11
Solano County, California (identified by Assessor’s Parcel number 0080-14-0440) and 938, 940,
12
942, 945, 946, 952, and 954 Tyler Street; 963, 965, 967, 969, 971, 973, 977, 979, 981, 983, 985,
13
989, and 991 Lincoln Street; and 900 and 954 Jackson Street, Benicia, Solano County, California
14
(identified by Assessor’s Parcel numbers 0080-28-0010, 0080-28-0030, 0080-28-0040, 0080-28-
15
0050) and all locations where hazardous substances released at, in, or from those addresses may
16
come to be located in the future (the “Site”). On April 27, 2017 DTSC and the United States filed
17
a Joint Notice of Tentative Settlement and asked the Court for additional time to file dispositional
18
papers. On April 28, 2017 the Court filed a Minute Order that stayed the matter and instructed
19
the parties to file dispositional documents on or before September 1, 2017. On August 31, 2017,
20
the Parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order seeking additional time to file the proposed
21
Consent Decree on or before November 1, 2017. ECF No. 8. The Parties stated that in the event
22
the proposed Consent Decree could not be filed with the Court by November 1, 2017, the parties
23
agreed to file a joint status report notifying the Court of the status of the approvals. Id. at 3. The
24
Court approved the stipulated extension on August 31, 2017. ECF No. 9. The parties entered
25
into a supplemental stipulated extension to extend the deadline until December 1, 2017, which
26
was approved by the Court.
27
28
1
Joint Status Report, Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC)
Case 2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC Document 12 Filed 11/30/17 Page 3 of 5
1
2
SETTLEMENT PROGRESS
DTSC and the United States have negotiated in good faith to resolve this matter. While
3
staff attorneys have agreed upon the terms of the Consent Decree that will settle this matter, the
4
review process, in which authorized officials within these two government organizations review
5
and approve the terms of the Consent Decree, is ongoing.
6
Under the settlement procedures for the United States, the settlement must be approved by
7
the Associate Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice. Undersigned counsel
8
for the United States has initiated the briefing process, but that process has taken longer than
9
anticipated due to intermediate review and the Thanksgiving Day holiday. Given the nature of
10
the review process, the undersigned counsel for the United States believes that it should take no
11
more than an additional 15-day period to obtain the requisite approval. In addition, the public,
12
including the current and past owners of the Site, will be provided the opportunity to comment on
13
the proposed Consent Decree. DTSC and the United States propose that the deadline for the
14
parties to lodge a proposed Consent Decree approved by the authorized officials of both
15
governments be briefly extended to December 15, 2017.
16
After the proposed Consent Decree is lodged, DTSC and the United States agree that a 60-
17
day comment period is appropriate. At the end of the comment period, DTSC will need to
18
respond to public comments. Due to the uncertainty as to the nature and number of the comments
19
that need to be considered and responded to, DTSC requests up to 30 days to respond to the
20
comments. After those 30 days, or sooner, if possible, the parties will file with the Court motions
21
for approval of the proposed Consent Decree, unless public comments disclose facts or
22
considerations that indicate the proposed Consent Decree is inappropriate, improper, or
23
inadequate, in which case DTSC may withdraw or withhold its consent to entry of the Consent
24
Decree.
25
STIPULATION
26
The parties hereby stipulate and agree that there is good cause for the Court to enter the
27
following order:
28
2
Joint Status Report, Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC)
Case 2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC Document 12 Filed 11/30/17 Page 4 of 5
1
2
3
1.
The matter is stayed until April 18, 2018. The deadline for the parties to lodge a
proposed Consent Decree is extended to December 15, 2017.
2.
In the event that a proposed Consent Decree cannot be filed with the Court by
4
December 15, 2017, the parties agree to file a Supplemental Joint Status Report notifying the
5
Court of the status of the approvals.
6
7
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9
Dated: November 30, 2017
10
11
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
SUSAN S. FIERING
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
12
/s/ Heather C. Leslie (as authorized on 11/30/17.)
ROSE B. FUA
HEATHER C. LESLIE
Deputy Attorneys General
Attorneys for the California Department of
Toxic Substances Control
13
14
15
16
17
Dated: November 30, 2017
JEFFREY H. WOOD
Acting Assistant Attorney General
18
19
20
21
22
/s/ Mark A. Rigau
MARK A. RIGAU
Senior Trial Counsel
Environment and Natural Resources
Division
United States Department of Justice
Attorneys for the United States of America
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Joint Status Report, Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC)
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: December 1, 2017
4
/s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE JOHN A. MENDEZ
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Joint Status Report, Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?